唐纳德·布莱德曼爵士(Sir Donald Bradman)——欧美史上十大击球手（板球）

唐纳德布莱德曼爵士欧美史上十大击球手板球在欧美史上十大击球手板球中排名第2名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

如果你正在谈论的历史最好的击球手并布莱德曼爵士。当然,他在美国近东难民援助组织更少的团队比今天. .但布莱德曼在一个时代,他们在这里玩上发现了球。我们不要忘记事实,像布莱德曼这样的球员职业生涯第二次世界大战打断了。一段时间后,他们的职业生涯resumed.Bradman致力于完善他的技能著称,这样的著名的高尔夫球击球碰壁树墩上磨他的手眼coordination.Bradman举行很多击球记录,如大多数双世纪和测试中得分最高的板球多年前这些纪录最终被打破。然而,他仍保持着最高的平均测试板的记录历史。历史,许多专家认为永远不会broken.When布莱德曼退出板球比赛在1948年,他得了6996分52测试29世纪…更多

If you are talking about the best batsman of all-time that is Sir Don Bradman. Granted, he played in anEra where there were fewer team than there is today... But Bradman played in an era where they played on uncovered pitches. Let's not forget the fact that players like Bradman had there careers interrupted by the Second World War. It was some time before their careers resumed.Bradman was known for his dedication to perfecting his skills, such the famous batting the golf ball up against the wall with a stump to sharpen his hand-eye coordination.Bradman held a lot of batting records, such as the most double centuries and the highest score in test cricket for many years before some of these records were eventually broken. However, he still holds the record for the highest average in test cricket history. A record that many experts believe will never be broken.When Bradman retired from test cricket in 1948 he had scored 6,996 runs in 52 tests with 29 centuries ... more

···································································

布莱德曼无疑是最好的。在大约20年期间平均为99.94 !没有人接近。如果有人出现在40年,几乎4倍测试板球比Tendulkar和比他更多的运行,因为他打了那么多,但平均只有一半多一点Tendulkar平均说30,我们会说他是比Tendulkar吗?我建议+ u2018hell没有+ u2018.It一样的布莱德曼v Tendulkar.Averages故事的全部。布莱德曼平均,可能至少下一个世界上最好的两倍时间平均。Tendulkar甚至没有击球率高达杰奎斯Kallis,还采取了271测试wicket,尽管萨钦在击球的道路子大陆所有time.Tendulkar也取得了8世纪测试包括至少两个200 +不出局对孟加拉国和津巴布韦和布莱德曼从来没有这样的劣质反对。布莱德曼的63 80测试局…更多

Bradman is easily the best. Averaged 99.94 over about a 20 year period! No one else comes close. If someone came along in 40 years and played almost 4 times more test cricket than Tendulkar has and made a lot more runs than him, because he played so much more, but averaged only a little over half what Tendulkar has averaged (say 30), would we say he was better than Tendulkar? I'd suggest "hell no".It's the same as for Bradman v Tendulkar.Averages tell the full story. Bradman averaged what, probably at least double what the next best in the world of his time averaged. Tendulkar doesn't even have a batting average as high as Jaques Kallis, who has also taken 271 test wickets, despite Sachin playing on batting roads in the sub continent all the time.Tendulkar has also made 8 test centuries (including at least two 200+ not outs) against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe and Bradman never got to play against such inferior opposition. (63 of Bradman's 80 test innings were ... more

···································································

我不知道为什么人们投票给Tendulkar。爵士并统计,他的技巧,和他对比赛的影响是惊人的。和那些说他只有52踢了几场比赛平均近100和Tendulkar扮演了超过180平均56看布莱德曼的一流的记录28067运行在234场比赛平均95.14 117世纪,37双世纪,6三元组和一个四452。而Tendulkar取得22 k近300场比赛我认为少于80世纪。击球在旧的时代更加困难,发现球,没有先进的蝙蝠,更大的理由,没有技术。我的意思是来吧,先生都是最大的。萨钦不是甚至比韦夫理查兹或者杰克霍布斯。

I don't know why people vote for Tendulkar. Sir Don stats, his skill, and his influence on the game are phenomenal. And those who say that he only played few matches (52 averaging almost 100) and Tendulkar has played over 180(average 56)have to look at Bradman's first-class record which is 28,067 runs in 234 matches at an average of 95.14 with 117 centuries, 37 double centuries, 6 triples and one quadruple (452*). While Tendulkar has scored just 22k (I think) in almost 300 matches with less than 80 centuries. Batting was much more difficult in the old era, uncovered pitches, no advanced bats, larger grounds, no technology. I mean come on, Sir Don is the greatest. Sachin is not even better than Viv Richards or Jack Hobbs.

···································································

哇有一些蠢货发布在这个网站上,布莱德曼不是1号如何?我猜这是事实的反映有超过十亿的印度人能够投票支持Tendulkar和布莱德曼只有2000万澳大利亚人投票,所以这些数字真正不利并投票。但这并不重要,因为所有人都能看到的有记录,标明萨钦一半不一样好,没有羞耻。

Gee there are some imbeciles posting on this website. How can Bradman not be number 1? I guess this is a reflection of the fact there are well over a billion Indians able to vote for Tendulkar and only 20 million Australians to vote for Bradman, so the numbers are well and truly stacked against The Don in a poll like this one. But it doesn't matter because the records are there for all to see and they clearly indicate Sachin is about as half as good as the Don, and there's no shame in that.

···································································

布莱德曼爵士是1号到目前为止!由于这是一个人气竞赛,你不能击败的票数从印度球迷,他们有10亿人口毕竟,所以你会看到萨钦,Sehwag, Dravid . .等。高。因此这个列表意味着很少!他们都是优秀的击球手毫无疑问,但他们不是布莱德曼。我很惊讶Gavaskar并不高,他是杰出的。劳拉是Tendulkar,劳拉是一个在压力下比赛的赢家。

Sir Bradman is No. 1 by far! Since this is a popularity contest, you can't beat the number of votes from Indian fans, they have a population of 1 billion afterall, so you are going to see Sachin, Sehwag, Dravid... Etc. High on the list. Therefore this list means very little! They were all excellent batsman no doubt, but they were not Bradman. I'm surprised Gavaskar wasn't higher, he was brilliant. Lara is up there with Tendulkar, Lara was a match winner under pressure.

What can you say he had a average of 99.94. At least 30 runs ahead of the second best Pollock at 60. He was the greatest batter of all time by miles. He batted 3 and coud handle the bowling with content. One guy was on 90 when he got out he got his century first. No one could come close to him. He barely got out. His average would be over 100 if the war didn't come. When the wicket keeper was injured he keeped. He was a very smart cricketer. Greatest sportsman of all time.

He the best full stop. 99.94 average at any time is still good. No come close.

···································································

哇难以置信的天才,是最伟大的运动员让孤独最大的击球手,没有人接近他的记录,那些低于他之所以常常被称为“传奇”,…这使也,圣人,我不确定。玩疾病和失踪的长时间战争期间,携带的期望。我很自豪地成为一个澳大利亚人,澳大利亚是最伟大的!

Wow unbelievable this genius, is the greatest sportsman of all time let a lone the greatest batsman of all time, nobody has come close to his record, those below him are refered to as legends...what does that make the Don, a saint, I am not sure. Playing with illness and missing long durations during the war, carrying the expectation of the nation. I am proud to be an Aussie and to have an Australian to be the greatest of all time!

···································································

如何。是最伟大的板球运动员Sachin Tendulkar。别误会我,他可能值得第二,但板球的唐•布拉德曼有一个状态,只有与其他运动的喜欢迈克尔·乔丹。99.94的平均水平。这家伙是一个头和脚首先别人。你可以有各种各样的记录和你,但到目前为止平均高于其余的来自un-comparable 20年的职业生涯。

How. HOW is Sachin Tendulkar the greatest Cricket player of all time. Don't get me wrong, he probably deserves second, but Don Bradman has a status in cricket that is only rivaled in other sports by the likes of Michael Jordan. 99.94 average. The guy is a head and foot above all others. You can have all sorts of records and what have you, but an average so far above the rest from a 20 year career is un-comparable.

···································································

这是真正令人惊讶的印第安人如何认为,卡比布莱德曼。Tendulkar测试平均?53.86。布莱德曼测试平均?只是一个卑微的99.94。布莱德曼不得不处理击球手的规则并不青睐。其中最promiment的身体行series.I可以明白印度人将有偏见的板球运动员,但他们蒙蔽,布莱德曼无疑是最好的击球手。

It is truly astonishing how Indians can think that that Tendulkar is better than Bradman. Tendulkar test average? 53.86. Bradman test Average? Just a lowly 99.94. Bradman had to deal with the rules where the Batsman was not favoured. The most promiment of these being the Body line series.I can understand that Indians will be biased to there fellow cricketers, but they are blinded to see that Bradman is undoubtably the best batsman ever lived.